浙江档案

《人工智能时代的档案凭证危机与法律重塑》一文将算法技术冲击界定为档案凭证危机，并据此主张由客体信任转向过程信任的范式更迭，存在明显的技术决定论倾向与理论外推过度的问题。本文通过对来源原则辩证、原始秩序原则位移、证据效力审视进行论述与其展开商榷，得出了数智时代档案凭证价值并非在算法冲击下被动瓦解，而是在技术架构、制度规范与学理传统的交互作用中持续被稳固与重构的结论。相较于诉诸激进的法律范式转型，更具可行性的路径在于强化元数据治理与技术封装，以实现档案凭证价值的功能等效，从而在守正中回应技术变革带来的挑战。

The article "The Crisis of Archival Evidence and Legal Reconstruction in the Era of Artificial Intelligence" defines the impact of algorithmic technology as a crisis of archival evidence， and accordingly advocates a paradigm shift from object-based trust to process-based trust， showing a clear tendency toward technological determinism and excessive theoretical extrapolation. This paper critically examines the principle of provenance， the displacement of the principle of original order， and the effectiveness of evidence， and reaches the conclusion that in the digital intelligence era， the value of archival evidence is not passively disintegrated under algorithmic impact， but is continuously stabilized and reconstructed through the interaction of technological frameworks， institutional norms， and scholarly traditions. Compared with resorting to radical legal paradigm shifts， a more feasible approach lies in strengthening metadata governance and technical encapsulation to achieve functional equivalence in the value of archival evidence， thereby addressing the challenges brought by technological change while maintaining fundamental principles.